MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967031270 · doi:10.1109/jpets.2019.2933250

Multi-Rate Mixed-Solver for Real-Time Nonlinear Electromagnetic Transient Emulation of AC/DC Networks on FPGA-MPSoC Architecture

2019· article· en· W2967031270 on OpenAlexafffund
Tong Duan, Zhuoxuan Shen, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsEmulationMPSoCOscilloscopeComputer scienceSolverTransient (computer programming)Field-programmable gate arrayNonlinear systemComputationIterative methodReal-time simulationSystem on a chipComputational scienceEmbedded systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear phenomena widely exist in AC/DC power systems, which should be accounted for accurately in real-time electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation for obtaining precise results for hardware-in-the-loop applications. However, iterative solutions such as the Newton-Raphason method that can precisely obtain the results for highly nonlinear elements, are time consuming and computationally onerous. To fully utilize the time space and optimize hardware computation resources without loss of accuracy, this work proposes a novel multi-rate mixed-solver for AC/DC systems, wherein both iterative and non-iterative solvers with different time-steps are applied to the decomposed subsystems, and the linear solvers are reused within each time-step. The proposed solver and the complete real-time emulation system are implemented on FPGA-MPSoC platform. The real-time results are captured by the oscilloscope and verified with PSCAD/EMTDC and SaberRD for system-level and device-level performance evaluation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power and Energy Technology Systems JournalSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207