MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967344588 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.052201

Beam asymmetry <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi></mml:math> for the photoproduction of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>η</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mi>η</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> mesons at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.8</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.28em"/><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2019· article· lv· W2967344588 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Adhikari, A. Ali, M. J. Amaryan, A. Austregesilo, Fernando Barbosa, J. Barlow, A. V. Barnes, E. Barriga, R. Barsotti, T. D. Beattie, В. В. Бердников, T. Black, W. Boeglin, M. Boër, W. J. Briscoe, T. Britton, W. K. Brooks, B. E. Cannon, N. Cao, E. Chudakov, S. Cole, O. Cortes, V. Credé, M. M. Dalton, T. Daniels, A. Deur, S. Dobbs, A. Dolgolenko, R. Dotel, M. Dugger, R. Dzhygadlo, H. Egiyan, T. Erbora, A. Ernst, P. Eugenio, C. Fanelli, S. Fegan, A. M. Foda, J. H. Foote, J. Frye, S. Furletov, L. Gan, A. Gasparian, N. Gevorgyan, C. Gleason, K. Goetzen, A. Gonçalves, V. Goryachev, L. Guo, H. Hakobyan, A. Hamdi, G. M. Huber, A. Hurley, D. G. Ireland, M. M. Ito, N. S. Jarvis, R. W. L. Jones, V. Kakoyan, G. Kalicy, M. Kamel, C. Kourkoumelis, S. Kuleshov, I. Larin, David Lawrence, Daniel Lersch, H. Li, W. Li, B. Liu, K. Livingston, G. J. Lolos, Valery E. Lyubovitskij, D. Mack, H. Marukyan, P. Mattione, V. Matveev, M. McCaughan, M. McCracken, W. McGinley, C. A. Meyer, R. Miskimen, R. E. Mitchell, F. Nerling, L. Ng, A. Ostrovidov, Z. Papandreou, M. Patsyuk, C. Paudel, P. Pauli, R. Pedroni, L. Pentchev, Κ. Peters, W. Phelps, E. Pooser, N. Qin, J. Reinhold, B. G. Ritchie, Lee Robison, D. Romanov, C. Romero, C. Salgado, A. M. Schertz, R. A. Schumacher, J. Schwiening, A. Yu. Semenov, I. A. Semenova, K. K. Seth, X. Y. Shen, M. R. Shepherd, E. S. Smith, D. I. Sober, A. Somov, S. Somov, Orlando Javier Soto Sandoval, Michael Staib, J. R. Stevens, I. I. Strakovsky, K. Suresh, В. В. Тарасов, A. Teymurazyan, A. Thiel, G. Vasileiadis, T. Whitlatch, N. Wickramaarachchi, M. Williams, Ting Xiao, Yunjie Yang, J. Zarling, Z. Zhang, G. Zhao, Qin-Song Zhou, X. Zhou, B. Zihlmann

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2019
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNuclear PhysicsComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChina Scholarship CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAsymmetryPhysicsBeam (structure)AlgorithmMathematicsOpticsParticle physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the measurement of the beam asymmetry $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}$ for the reactions $\stackrel{P\vec}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}p\ensuremath{\eta}$ and $\stackrel{P\vec}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}p{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ from the GlueX experiment using an 8.2--8.8-GeV linearly polarized tagged photon beam incident on a liquid hydrogen target in Hall D at Jefferson Laboratory. These measurements are made as a function of momentum transfer $\ensuremath{-}t$ with significantly higher statistical precision than our earlier $\ensuremath{\eta}$ measurements and are the first measurements of ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ in this energy range. We compare the results to theoretical predictions based on $t$-channel quasiparticle exchange. We also compare the ratio of ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}}_{\ensuremath{\eta}}$ to ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}}_{{\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}}$ to these models as this ratio is predicted to be sensitive to the amount of $s\overline{s}$ exchange in the production. We find that photoproduction of both $\ensuremath{\eta}$ and ${\ensuremath{\eta}}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ is dominated by natural parity exchange with little dependence on $\ensuremath{-}t$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.813

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4300.258

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207