MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967389911 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2019-0067

Dense SNP panels resolve closely related Chinook salmon populations

2019· article· en· W2967389911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Garrett J. McKinney, Carita E. Pascal, William D. Templin, Sara Gilk‐Baumer, Tyler H. Dann, Lisa W. Seeb, James E. Seeb

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouthwest Fisheries Science CenterAlaska Sustainable Salmon FundNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationAlaska Department of Fish and GameUniversity of WashingtonMassachusetts Department of Fish and GameU.S. Department of Commerce
KeywordsChinook windOncorhynchusBiologyGenotypingFisherySNP genotypingSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeographyFish <Actinopterygii>GeneticsGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) are migratory fish that are highly valued for subsistence, sport, and commercial fisheries throughout their native range. Populations of Chinook salmon in western Alaska have exhibited long-term declines, leading to restrictions on harvests. Management priorities require greater resolution for genetic stock identification (GSI) than is available with current methods. We leveraged RADseq, TaqMan, and GT-seq data originating from multiple sources, collected through time, to develop a set of GT-seq panels containing 1092 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that improved GSI resolution in western Alaska for at-sea and in-river sampling. We generated a dense linkage map to ensure that markers selected for panels spanned the entire genome. In addition, we identified multiple RADseq markers that were associated with sex; these aligned to a 5-centimorgan (cM) region on the sex chromosome. Finally, we developed a bioinformatic pipeline to streamline analysis of GT-seq data that is capable of genotyping microhaplotypes and paralogs, both of which can improve GSI resolution over traditional single-SNP data. Our panels and pipeline provide tools for management agencies to rapidly and easily analyze large-scale genotyping projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207