Phylogenetic Analysis of 28S rRNA Gene of Indigenous Xiphinema pachydermum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An attempt has been made to determine the phylogenetic relationship to trace out the evolutionary pattern of the test sequence of Xiphinema pachydermum partial 28S rRNA gene and to find out relationship of the same with other selected sequences of NCBI by constructing phylogenetic trees. Nucleotide sequence of 28S ribosomal RNA gene of Xiphinema pachydermum from Solan, Himachal Pradesh (AM779749.1) showed maximum homology of 93% with Xiphinema inaequale isolate HP 28S large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence (HM163210.1) from Baijnath, Himachal Pradesh. The pairwise similarity score of 38 nucleotide sequences with test sequence elucidated 90-93% sequence identity with other sequences from India. Sequences from South Africa showed 91% identity with the test sequence while sequences from Brazil, Czech Republic, Japan, China and Slovakia showed 90% similarity. USA, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Canada depicted 89% sequence homology with the Solan isolate. Multiple sequence alignment of 38 selected sequences of Xiphinema species having similarity score between 89 to 93 percent was performed using Clustal Omega and its output was used in Phylip 3.695 for constructing phylograms. The test sequence, AM779749.1 showed maximum closeness with another Indian isolate from Himachal Pradesh, HM163210.1 (Xiphinema inaequale) at significant bootstrap values of 100 both by Neighbor Joining and Maximum Parsimony methods respectively, which are further in close proximity to cluster of sequences containing another isolate from Himachal Pradesh, HM163211.1 (Xiphinema lambertii isolate XL 28S large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence). While close proximity to the sequences from Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Italy, however having low bootstrap value may depict that insect might have migrated from Central Europe to India or vice versa. The predicted molecular weight of deduced amino acid sequence was 6031.69Da and was found to be rich in glycine (13.6%), serine (13.6%), alanine (11.9%), proline (10.2%) and aspartic acid (8.5%).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".