MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967744809 · doi:10.1063/1.5112142

Room temperature ferrimagnetism in Yb-doped relaxor ferroelectric PbFe2/3W1/3O3

2019· article· en· W2967744809 on OpenAlexafffund
D. C. Joshi, Sergei A. Ivanov, А. А. Буш, Tapati Sarkar, Zuo‐Guang Ye, П. Нордблад, R. Mathieu

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMultiferroics and related materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersVetenskapsrådetStiftelsen Olle Engkvist ByggmästareCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRussian Foundation for Basic Research
KeywordsFerrimagnetismMaterials scienceFerroelectricityCondensed matter physicsAntiferromagnetismHysteresisMagnetic momentAtmospheric temperature rangePerovskite (structure)MultiferroicsPhase (matter)Lattice constantDopingMagnetizationMagnetic fieldCrystallographyThermodynamicsDielectricChemistryPhysicsDiffractionOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report ferrimagnetism and reentrant relaxor ferroelectricity near room temperature in a Yb-doped PbFe2/3W1/3O3 cubic perovskite. Structural analysis reveals the presence of a single cubic perovskite phase, with the Fm3¯m space group [lattice parameter: a = 8.0112(3) Å], and partial B-site ordering. The B-site ordering yields uncompensated magnetic moments in the antiferromagnetic structure of PbFe2/3W1/3O3 and ferrimagnetism near room temperature. An excess moment of ∼0.6 μB/B-site may be estimated from magnetic hysteresis curves recorded up to 50 kOe at 5 K. The temperature dependent magnetodielectric study reveals a sequential phase transition from a long-range ferroelectric state (across 280 K) to a short-range relaxor ferroelectric state (across 190 K). The long-range ferroelectric ordering is found to be more affected by the application of external magnetic fields than the relaxor phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topicMultiferroics and related materialsFrench-language works237,207