MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967786662 · doi:10.1002/jms.4428

Silver spray deposition for AgLDI imaging MS of cholesterol and other olefins on thin tissue sections

2019· article· en· W2967786662 on OpenAlexafffund
Ethan Yang, Frédéric Fournelle, Pierre Chaurand

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mass Spectrometry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistrySilver nanoparticleSilver nitrateDeposition (geology)Mass spectrometry imagingSputteringMass spectrometryNanoparticleNanotechnologyThin filmChromatographyOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Olefins such as cholesterol and unsaturated fatty acids play important biological roles. Silver-assisted laser desorption ionization (AgLDI) takes advantage of the strong affinity of silver to conjugate with double bonds to selectively ionize these molecules for imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) experiments. For IMS studies, two main approaches for silver deposition have been described in the literature: fine coating by silver sputtering and spray deposition of silver nanoparticles. While these approaches allow for extremely high resolution IMS experiments to be conducted, they are not readily available to all laboratories. Herein, we present a silver nitrate spray deposition approach as an alternative to silver sputtering and nanoparticle deposition for routine IMS analysis. The silver nitrate spray has the same level of specificity and sensitivity for olefins, particularly cholesterol, and has shown to be capable of IMS experiments down to 10-μm spatial resolution. Minimal sample preparation and the affordability of silver nitrate make this a convenient and accessible technique worth considering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207