MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2967809013 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-11219

Increasing the Sensitivity of Phospholipid Analyses from Biological Extracts via Trimethylation Enhancement using Diazomethane (TrEnDi) and Tandem Mass Spectrometry

2015· dissertation· en· W2967809013 on OpenAlexafffund
Carlos Canez Quijada

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsDiazomethaneChemistryChromatographyTandem mass spectrometryDerivatizationPhosphatidylethanolaminePhospholipidMass spectrometryDetection limitLiquid chromatography–mass spectrometryPhosphatidylcholineBiochemistryOrganic chemistryMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TrEnDi is a novel rapid in-solution technique for quaternization of phospholipid amino groups and methylation of phosphate groups via reaction with diazomethane and tetrafluoroboric acid. TrEnDi significantly enhanced the sensitivity of mass spectrometry and tandem MS studies of phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin standards. Use of 13C-diazomethane enabled creation of independent precursor ion scans (PIS) for modified PE and modified PC species which would otherwise can produce undistinguishable isobaric species. The efficacy of the technique was tested on a complex biological sample. 13C-TrEndi provided a drastic sensitivity enhancement for PE and PS species enabling the identification and quantitation of several species which were below the limit of detection and quantitation prior to modification. Derivatization provided a modest sensitivity enhancement for PC species and allowed quantitation of several PC species that were below the limit of quantitation prior to modification. SM species exhibited neither sensitivity increase nor hindrance after modification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies→French-language works237,207→