MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967835216 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000037

Spectrum of Current Management of Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertensive Crisis

2019· article· en· W2967835216 on OpenAlex
Meghan Bernier, Lewis H. Romer, Melania M. Bembea

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionMilrinoneIntensivistPulmonologistIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInotropeIntensive careInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary hypertension is a growing pediatric problem and children may present with pulmonary hypertensive crisis-a life-threatening emergency requiring acute interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize the broad spectrum of care provided in North American PICUs for children who present with pulmonary hypertensive crisis. DESIGN: Electronic cross-sectional survey. Survey questions covered the following: demographics of the respondents, institution, and patient population; pulmonary hypertension diagnostic modalities; pulmonary hypertension-specific pharmacotherapies; supportive therapies, including sedation, ventilation, and inotropic support; and components of multidisciplinary teams. SETTING: PICUs in the United States and Canada. SUBJECTS: Faculty members from surveyed institutions. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 50% of 99 identified institutions. Of the respondents, 82.2% were pediatric intensivists from large units, and 73.9% had over a decade of experience beyond training. Respondents provided care for a median of 10 patients/yr with acute pulmonary hypertensive crisis. Formal echocardiography protocols existed at 61.1% of institutions with varying components reported. There were no consistent indications for cardiac catheterization during a pulmonary hypertensive crisis admission. All institutions used inhaled nitric oxide, and enteral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor was the most frequently used additional targeted vasodilator therapy. Milrinone and epinephrine were the most frequently used vasoactive infusions. Results showed no preferred approach to mechanical ventilation. Fentanyl and dexmedetomidine were the preferred sedative infusions. A formal pulmonary hypertension consulting team was reported at 51.1% of institutions, and the three most common personnel were pediatric cardiologist, pediatric pulmonologist, and advanced practice nurse. CONCLUSIONS: The management of critically ill children with acute pulmonary hypertensive crisis is diverse. Findings from this survey may inform formal recommendations - particularly with regard to care team composition and pulmonary vasodilator therapies - as North American guidelines are currently lacking. Additional work is needed to determine best practice, standardization of practice, and resulting impact on outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it