MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967835216 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000000037

Spectrum of Current Management of Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertensive Crisis

2019· article· en· W2967835216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meghan Bernier, Lewis H. Romer, Melania M. Bembea

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary hypertensionMilrinoneIntensivistPulmonologistIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineInotropeIntensive careInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pulmonary hypertension is a growing pediatric problem and children may present with pulmonary hypertensive crisis-a life-threatening emergency requiring acute interventions. The aim of this study was to characterize the broad spectrum of care provided in North American PICUs for children who present with pulmonary hypertensive crisis. DESIGN: Electronic cross-sectional survey. Survey questions covered the following: demographics of the respondents, institution, and patient population; pulmonary hypertension diagnostic modalities; pulmonary hypertension-specific pharmacotherapies; supportive therapies, including sedation, ventilation, and inotropic support; and components of multidisciplinary teams. SETTING: PICUs in the United States and Canada. SUBJECTS: Faculty members from surveyed institutions. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate was 50% of 99 identified institutions. Of the respondents, 82.2% were pediatric intensivists from large units, and 73.9% had over a decade of experience beyond training. Respondents provided care for a median of 10 patients/yr with acute pulmonary hypertensive crisis. Formal echocardiography protocols existed at 61.1% of institutions with varying components reported. There were no consistent indications for cardiac catheterization during a pulmonary hypertensive crisis admission. All institutions used inhaled nitric oxide, and enteral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor was the most frequently used additional targeted vasodilator therapy. Milrinone and epinephrine were the most frequently used vasoactive infusions. Results showed no preferred approach to mechanical ventilation. Fentanyl and dexmedetomidine were the preferred sedative infusions. A formal pulmonary hypertension consulting team was reported at 51.1% of institutions, and the three most common personnel were pediatric cardiologist, pediatric pulmonologist, and advanced practice nurse. CONCLUSIONS: The management of critically ill children with acute pulmonary hypertensive crisis is diverse. Findings from this survey may inform formal recommendations - particularly with regard to care team composition and pulmonary vasodilator therapies - as North American guidelines are currently lacking. Additional work is needed to determine best practice, standardization of practice, and resulting impact on outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care ExplorationsSame topicPulmonary Hypertension Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207