Outcome of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic fracture in hemiarthroplasty by trochanter hook plate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Fractures around hip is an increasing burden in elderly causing significant morbidity and mortality. Periprosthetic fractures occurring after hemiarthroplasty of hip is a serious complication. In this study, we have reviewed our experience in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. Method: In our study 8 patients (6 men and 2 women; mean age: 65 ± 8 years) with periprosthetic fractures treated with ORIF with trochanteric hook plate with proximal unicortical screws in the zone of prosthesis and below by bicortical screws with a minimum follow up of 4months and maximum up to 1year was carried out. The average union period was checked after operation with radiologic findings. Radiologic outcomes were evaluated .All cases were assessed postoperatively for functional outcome in terms of range of motion, pain and walking distance. Results: The average time for union was 16 weeks and we have achieved 90% of union and Good range of motion with no pain. There was no case with loss of fixation or loss of reduction requiring revision surgery. Conclusion: We observed good functional outcome in patient treated with Trochanteric hook plate. Reversed trochanteric hook plate is a reliable, effective option for management of Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".