Part 2: Physicochemical characterization of bevacizumab in 2 mg/mL antibody solutions as used in human i.v. administration: Comparison of originator with a biosimilar candidate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The physicochemical properties of Avastin® manufactured in the USA (Originator USA) and in Europe (Originator EU) and ABX-BEV, a bevacizumab biosimilar drug product candidate produced by Apobiologix Inc., were characterized at a clinically relevant concentration of 2 mg/mL following dilution of the 25 mg/mL drug products with 0.9% NaCl. Measurements using 14 orthogonal analytical methods performed within 5 h after dilution showed good similarity of the three antibodies as regards secondary structure, conformation, aggregation properties, subvisible and visible particles. No significant protein aggregation was observed within 5 h at 24 °C in the 2 mg/mL bevacizumab solutions. The same solutions that were measured within 5 h after dilution were analyzed again after 24 h overnight refrigeration at 2-8 °C: all 2 mg/mL bevacizumab solutions showed an increase in the number and sizes of aggregates, especially the particles larger than 10 μm and 25 μm. The data show the very good similarity in the physicochemical properties of ABX-BEV with Originators USA and EU at a clinically relevant concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".