MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2967934904 · doi:10.15407/pge2019.02.053

Prospects of implementing the internal system of quota trade for greenhouse gas emission in Ukraine

2019· article· en· W2967934904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Problems of General Energy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic and Business Development Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasGreenhouseNatural resource economicsEuropean unionEmissions tradingOrder (exchange)Environmental scienceClean Development MechanismBusinessInternational tradeEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is devoted to the analysis of one of efficient measures for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in the world and prospects of its implementation in Ukraine in order to fulfill its obligations under the Paris Agreement, namely, the market mechanism, i.e., system of quota trade for greenhouse gas emissions. At present, about 40 countries and more than 20 cities, states, and regions, whose fraction in the global greenhouse gas emissions is equal to one-fourth, determine the price of quota for greenhouse gas emissions as the main tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and/or ensuring their moderate growth. More and more such jurisdictions introduce the fee for greenhouse gas emissions through the development and implementation the systems of quota trade for greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, as the world assesses consequences of the Paris Climate Agreement, attention is transferred from the determination of measures for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (in the form of nationally-defined contributions) to important issues of the ways to achieve these reductions and reporting on them in the framework of future mechanisms for the international accounting of the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. This article outlines the most important steps in establishing the structure of system of quota trade for greenhouse gas emissions in Ukraine. At the same time, the authors lean on conceptual analysis and some of the most practical lessons learned earlier as a result of the introduction of emission trading systems around the world, including the European Union, several provinces and cities in China, California, Quebec, north-eastern states of the USA, Alberta, New Zealand, Kazakhstan, Republic of Korea, Tokyo, and Saitama. The decarbonization of Ukrainian economy is an important component of the state policy of ensuring sustainable development, in particular, in the context of global goals of sustainable development for the long-term outlook. Key measures and politics aimed at preventing climate change include energy saving, energy efficiency, renewable energy, carbon tax, systems of quota trade for emissions, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it