MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968036939 · doi:10.1080/15435075.2019.1653876

Global offshore wind energy deployment: a geo-clustering approach

2019· article· en· W2968036939 on OpenAlexaff
Samira Keivanpour, Amar Ramudhin, Daoud Aı̈t-Kadi, Salman Kimiagari

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Green Energy · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWind Energy Research and Development
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers UniversityUniversité LavalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOffshore wind powerWind powerRenewable energySubmarine pipelineCluster analysisEnvironmental scienceSoftware deploymentLeverage (statistics)Investment (military)Environmental economicsMeteorologyEnvironmental resource managementComputer scienceEngineeringGeologyGeographyEconomicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The availability of wind resources around the world makes it an interesting alternative for clean energy. Offshore wind energy with considerable evolution in technology and investment becomes a sustainable source of renewable energy in the future. Technical feasibility and geographical constraints, demand for energy and the stability of regions for long-term investments and development of wind parks are critical factors in the estimation of offshore wind potential. This paper provides a geo-clustering approach to offshore wind energy to find hotspots around the world. A clustering approach based on neural network is applied to find the segments and the profiles of them. The segmentation is performed based on geographic location, total wind capacity in shallow, transitional and deep water, length of coastline, demand, investment leverage, and risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.645

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Green EnergySame topicWind Energy Research and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207