MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968038823 · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009545

Community pharmacy medication review, death and re-admission after hospital discharge: a propensity score-matched cohort study

2019· article· en· W2968038823 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lauren Lapointe‐Shaw, Chaim M. Bell, Peter C. Austin, Lusine Abrahamyan, Noah Ivers, Ping Li, Petros Pechlivanoglou, Donald A. Redelmeier, Lisa Dolovich

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Quality & Safety · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreHospital for Sick ChildrenSunnybrook Health Science CentreSinai Health SystemInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesWomen's College HospitalSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareCanadian Patient Safety Institute
KeywordsMedicinePharmacyEmergency departmentEmergency medicinePropensity score matchingCohortCohort studyRetrospective cohort studyPsychological interventionCommunity hospitalAdverse effectInternal medicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In-hospital medication review has been linked to improved outcomes after discharge, yet there is little evidence to support the use of community pharmacy-based interventions as part of transitional care. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether receipt of a postdischarge community pharmacy-based medication reconciliation and adherence review is associated with a reduced risk of death or re-admission. DESIGN: Propensity score-matched cohort study. SETTING: Ontario, Canada PARTICIPANTS: Patients over age 66 years discharged home from an acute care hospital from 1 April 2007 to 16 September 2016. EXPOSURE: MedsCheck, a publicly funded medication reconciliation and adherence review provided by community pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was time to death or re-admission (defined as an emergency department visit or urgent rehospitalisation) up to 30 days. Secondary outcomes were the 30-day count of outpatient physician visits and time to adverse drug event. RESULTS: MedsCheck recipients had a lower risk of 30-day death or re-admission (23.4% vs 23.9%, HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.00, p=0.02), driven by a decreased risk of death (1.7% vs 2.1%, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.86) and rehospitalisation (11.0% vs 11.4%, HR 0.96, 95% 0.93-0.99). In a post hoc sensitivity analysis with pharmacy random effects added to the propensity score model, these results were substantially attenuated. There was no significant difference in 30-day return to the emergency department (22.5% vs 22.8%, HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01) or adverse drug events (1.5% vs 1.5%, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.12). MedsCheck recipients had more outpatient visits (mean 2.11 vs 2.09, RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among older adults, receipt of a community pharmacy-based medication reconciliation and adherence review was associated with a small reduced risk of short-term death or re-admission. Due to the possibility of unmeasured confounding, experimental studies are needed to clarify the relationship between postdischarge community pharmacy-based medication review and patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.211
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Quality & SafetySame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207