Nuclear structure of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cd</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>112</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> studied through the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Cd</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>111</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo></mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math> reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nuclear structure of $^{112}\mathrm{Cd}$ has been investigated with the $^{111}\mathrm{Cd}(\stackrel{P\vec}{d},p)^{112}\mathrm{Cd}$ reaction. Isotopically enriched targets of $^{111}\mathrm{Cd}$ were bombarded with 22 MeV polarized deuterons, and reaction products were analyzed with a magnetic spectrograph. Angular distributions and analyzing powers were determined for 129 states, 49 of which are newly observed, up to approximately 4.2 MeV in excitation energy. The observed angular distributions were compared with distorted wave Born approximation (DWBA) and adiabatic distorted wave approximation (ADWA) calculations to extract the spectroscopic factors. Two-quasineutron configurations involving coupling to the ${s}_{\frac{1}{2}}$ orbital are suggested. The sum of spectroscopic strengths extracted by using the ADWA for the individual $l$ transfers are combined with previous results from the $^{111}\mathrm{Cd}(\stackrel{P\vec}{d},t)$ reaction and show good agreement with the $2j+1$ sum rule, whereas those extracted with the DWBA calculations are significantly less.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.471 | 0.449 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".