MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Safety of bevacizumab when given perioperatively for colorectal cancer with liver metastases: McGill University pilot study

2009· article· en· W2968292138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Petr Kavan, Nathaniel Bouganim, Marc Eid, Peter Metrakos, Prosanto Chaudhury, Gerald Batist

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBevacizumabFOLFIRIOxaliplatinSurgeryColorectal cancerPerioperativeRegimenChemotherapyInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e15083 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) increases responses and survival rates when used with chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Current practice is to give peri-operative chemotherapy for resectable CRC liver metasases (LM). The safety and efficacy of chemo-BV in this setting is unknown. Post-operative complications have been reported in patients (pts) who underwent surgery while receiving BV. The goals were to determine safety of perioperative BV. Methods: In a prospective pilot study, patients with resectable LM from October 2005 to 2008 that received BV perioperatively along with chemotherapy. Of a total of 60 pts, 34 had oxaliplatin-based CTX, 22 CPT-11 (FOLFIRI) and 4 IROX. All but seven pts received BV pre and postoperatively. The average age was 55 years. All patients underwent liver surgery 6–8weeks post last dose of BV. Univariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association of patient and tumour characteristics, therapy and postoperative complications. Results: Postoperative complications developed in a total of 24 pts (40%). 12 pts (35%) who received Oxaliplatin CTX + BV, 9 pts (40%) with CPT 11 CTX + BV and 3 pts (75%) with Oxaliplatin + CPT-11 CTX +BV. The average time from BV discontinuation to surgery was 49 days. No significant associations were identified between BV and CTX regimen or timing and postoperative complications. Wound healing complication were most frequent with 8 pts (13%), DVT diagnosed in 6 pts (10%), protracted pancytopenia 4 pts (7%), sepsis 1pt, infections 2pts, MI 1pt, acute cardiomyopathy 1pt, and billiary leak 1pt. No bowel perforations or sudden deaths were reported. These side effects apart from thromboembolic events are comparable to previously reported post-operative complications. Conclusions: Neither the use of BV with CTX nor timing of BV administration were associated with a non acceptable increase in complication rates as compared to previously published by EORTC intergroup. Our data confirm that the combination of BV with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is feasible and safe in patients CRC LM. A higher incidence of thromboembolic events was seen. To determine the optimal timing and drug combination prospective randomized trials are urgently required. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207