MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2968381245 · doi:10.1061/9780784482599.034

Permafrost-Related Erosional Effects of Water Level Regulation and Climate Change along the Shorelines of Aishihik and Canyon Lakes, Southwest Yukon

2019· article· en· W2968381245 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. McKillop, Dave Sacco, D. Cronmiller

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostShoreGeologyClimate changeErosionCoastal erosionCanyonHydrology (agriculture)Aeolian processesPhysical geographyGeomorphologyOceanographyGeographyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lake shoreline erosion is caused by wind-generated waves (mechanical erosion) and, in areas of permafrost, can be compounded by thawing ground ice (thermal erosion). In southwest Yukon, erosion patterns along the shorelines of Aishihik and Canyon Lakes reflect the combined effects of climate change and lake level regulation for hydroelectricity, which began in 1975. An investigation characterizing shoreline erosion and aiming to determine the relative contributions of lake level regulation and climate change was undertaken to support an environmental and socio-economic effects assessment associated with hydroelectric facility relicensing. The investigation involved three phases: (i) compilation and review of pertinent topographic, geological, and hydrological information; (ii) helicopter- and ground-based field reconnaissance; and (iii) mapping of shoreline types, relative severity of erosion and recession from former beaches at select sites. Three types of shorelines were identified based on their distinct responses to lake level regulation and climate change. Type 1 shorelines exhibit a moderate slope of coarse-grained sediment and may contain ice-poor permafrost; they are relatively insensitive to climate change and quickly self-stabilize when exposed to higher lake levels. Type 2 shorelines typically exhibit an abruptly steep embankment of ice-rich, fine-grained sediments; they are vulnerable to recession through long-term retrogressive thaw and slumping in response to climate change and lake level regulation. Type 3 shorelines are typically low-relief and composed of fine-grained, ice-rich sediments; they are most sensitive to higher lake levels due to inundation-induced thaw. Erosion along the Type 2 and Type 3 shorelines of Aishihik and Canyon Lakes appears to be driven primarily by climatic effects, despite an anomalous peak in lake level at the onset of regulation that locally initiated and exacerbated erosion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→