Inflammatory Response in Indian Major Carp, Catla catla and Barb, Puntius cauveriensis, to Aphanomyces invadans and Freund’s Complete Adjuvant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the present study is to determine the pattern of inflammatory response in two different susceptible fish species Indian major carp, Catla catla and barb, Puntius cauveriensis of Epizootic Ulcerative Syndrome (EUS) to two different antigen models (Aphanomyces invadans and Freund's complete adjuvant).Inflammatory response studies with A. invadans indicated that in the case of barb there was very weak or no inflammatory response.The severity of myonecrosis was so high that in the moribund fish, virtually no normal muscle fibres were observed in the lesion area.On the other hand, in the case of Indian major carp (catla), there was an active host inflammatory response (particularly at the central part of the lesion) and the severity of myonecrosis was less than that of the barb.Studies on inflammatory response to Freund's complete adjuvant indicated that similar to A. invadans experiment, the degree of inflammatory cellular infiltration was very low in the case of barb and no inflammatory cells were observed
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".