Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the sixtieth anniversary since the enactment of the San Francisco Peace Treaty (SFPT) (April 28, 2012), an international conference entitled Sixty Years of the San Francisco System: Continuation, Transformation, and Historical Reconciliation in the Asia-Pacific was held in Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. The whole-day conference was devoted to examining key developments of the contentious political and security issues in the Asia-Pacific that share a common foundation in the early post-World War II arrangement with Japan. The SFPT, together with its associated security arrangements, significantly shaped the post-World War II order and laid the foundation for the structure of the Cold War confrontation in the Asia-Pacific: The San Francisco System is in many ways responsible for continuing tensions in the region. These include both tangible and intangible conflicts, of which the major issues were examined at the conference, where intensive and lively discussions were exchanged among the participants from China (PRC and ROC), Japan, Korea (ROK), Russia, Australia, the United States, and across Canada. Although almost all participants acknowledged the importance of peaceful resolution, they did not necessarily share a common view on the issues examined, such as disputes over territories and “history” problems. Nevertheless, it generated significant inspirations for considering conflict resolutions in the region.1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.018 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".