MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968723553 · doi:10.5287/ora-dxqaq9za5

Improving outcomes in paediatric surgery through the development and implementation of core outcome sets – the NETS studies

2018· dissertation· en· W2968723553 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Benjamin Allin

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineGastroschisisDelphi methodPediatricsOutcome (game theory)CohortPopulationClosure (psychology)Intensive care medicineFamily medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Gold-standard medical practice involves utilising high quality evidence to support clinicians, patients, and their families in identifying the optimal treatment pathway for a particular individual. Currently, there is insufficient high quality evidence to allow paediatric surgeons, who are responsible for the care of children requiring surgical intervention from birth through to sixteen years of age, to deliver such gold-standard practice. Developing and utilising core outcome sets in research has been proposed as one method through which the quality of the paediatric surgical evidence-base can be improved. Thesis aim The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate whether outcomes in paediatric surgery can be improved through the development and use of core outcome sets. Methods Core outcome sets were developed for two exemplar paediatric surgical conditions, Hirschsprung’s disease, where the infant’s intestines do not function properly, and gastroschisis, where the infant is born with the intestines outside of the body. The same methodology, consisting of a systematic review, a three-phase Delphi process, a consensus meeting, and a measurement meeting was used for development of each core outcome set. Key stakeholders, including patients, parents of affected children, and clinicians, were involved in each development process. Subsequently, a joint British Isles-Canadian population-based cohort study was undertaken to investigate the effect of three key treatment modalities; silo repair; operative primary fascial closure; and ward-based reduction; on short-term core outcomes for infants born with gastroschisis. A British-Isles-wide cohort study was also undertaken to describe core outcomes at primary school age for children born with Hirschsprung’s disease. The latter study involved collection of parent reported outcomes as well as data from clinicians. Findings The developed Hirschsprung’s disease core outcome set consisted of ten outcomes identified as important by key stakeholders; death, faecal incontinence, bowel function score, unplanned reoperation, voluntary bowel movements, urinary incontinence, psychological stress, quality of life, permanent stoma, and Hirschsprung’s Associated Enterocolitis. Eight outcomes were included in the gastroschisis core outcome set; death, sepsis, growth, number of operations, severe gastrointestinal complication, time on parenteral nutrition, liver disease and quality of life. In infants born with gastroschisis who had no features of significant bowel injury at birth, the cohort study demonstrated that in comparison to operative primary fascial closure, the use of silo repair was associated with approximately a 75% reduction in the incidence of severe gastrointestinal complications in the first 28 days of life, but at the expense of a 40% increase in number of operations, a doubling in the risk of experiencing one or more infection, and potentially a small increase in number of days on which parenteral nutrition was received over the same period of time. Lower than anticipated data return rates limited the certainty with which conclusions could be drawn from the Hirschsprung’s disease study. Nevertheless, there was sufficient evidence to suggest that approximately 60% of children with Hirschsprung’s disease are not continent of faeces at five to seven years of age, 45% have undergone at least one unplanned reoperation, and 11% are incontinent of urine. There is also some limited evidence to suggest that one operation used for treating children with Hirschsprung’s disease, the Swenson procedure, is associated with a greater incidence of unplanned reoperations than the other main surgical treatments of Hirschsprung’s disease, the Soave repair and the Duhamel repair. Conclusions It is possible, in a practical and expeditious way, to develop core outcome sets for paediatric surgical conditions. It is also possible to use those core outcome sets in large-scale observational studies to address clinically important questions. Results of such studies can be used to improve the care of children undergoing early surgery. The conclusion of this thesis is therefore that developing and implementing the use of core outcome sets can improve outcomes in paediatric surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.266
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.356
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2660.356
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.009
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicCongenital Anomalies and Fetal SurgeryFrench-language works237,207