MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968792535

Additive effect of selenium and bicalutamide in human prostate cancer cells in vitro

2006· article· en· W2968792535 on OpenAlexaff
Vasundara Venkateswaran, Seamus Teahan, Ahmed Haddad, Laurence Klotz, Linda Sugar, Neil Fleshner

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreWomen's College HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBicalutamideProstate cancerLNCaPPropidium iodideApoptosisCancerSeleniumCancer researchMedicineMalignancyOncologyFlow cytometryInternal medicineEndocrinologyProgrammed cell deathBiologyChemistryImmunologyAndrogen receptorBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3835 Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the commonest non-cutaneous malignancy and second leading cause of cancer death in males. Evidence from epidemiological and clinical trials indicates that selenium may reduce the risk of PCa. To date, selenium has not been shown to offer a therapeutic benefit in the management of established prostate cancer. We hypothesize that a combination of selenium and bicalutamide could lead to delayed androgen resistance, providing additional therapeutic benefit for the management of advanced PCa. Methods: Human PCa cells {LNCaP and PC3-AR2 (AR positive) and PC3-M (AR negative)} were incubated for 72 h with, varying concentrations of seleneno-DLmethionine (0-200 μM), bicalutamide (0-100 μM) or a combination of both. Cells were fixed and stained with propidium iodide for flow cytometric analysis. Cellular protein and DNA were extracted to determine expression of apoptotic markers. The individual and combined effects of these compounds on cell proliferation were assessed by MTT assay. Results: Data obtained from flow-cytometric analysis demonstrate that significant apoptosis (p

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207