Renewable Energy Integration in Diesel-Based Microgrids at the Canadian Arctic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of climate change is significant in the arctic regions of the world, with the carbon footprint from diesel-only based electricity generation in remote arctic communities adding to the environmental degradation through greenhouse gas (GHG) emission, oil spills, and black carbon. Moreover, the dependence on diesel and its associated costs are an economic problem for these communities, particularly in the Canadian Arctic, where governments subsidize this fuel. Thus, this article presents specific studies including new variable-speed generator (VSG) technologies that demonstrate the feasibility, impact, and benefits of introducing renewable energy (RE) together with VSGs in remote microgrids in the Canadian Arctic. More specifically, this article describes a two-step procedure to select remote communities for detailed feasibility studies of deployment of RE sources, including a generation expansion planning (GEP) framework and optimization model for RE and new VSG integration applied to the selected communities, to minimize diesel dependence of isolated microgrids and maximize the incorporation of environmentally friendly generation technologies. The proposed approach is applied to communities in Nunavut and the North West Territories in the Canadian Arctic, based on actual data, to study the technoeconomic feasibility of RE integration and develop business cases for diesel generation replacement with RE and VSG generation in these communities. The obtained optimal plans contain diesel-RE hybrid combinations that would yield substantial economic savings and reductions on GHG emissions, which are being used as the base for actual deployments in some of the studied communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".