Simultaneous accelerometer and optical fibre multi-azimuth walk-away VSP experiment: Newell County, Alberta, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CREWES conducted a high-resolution multi-azimuth walk-away three-component vertical seismic profile (VSP) survey at the Containment and Monitoring Institutes Field Research Station (CaMI.FRS) in September 2018. This data is primarily intended for use in full-waveform inversion (FWI) and modelling studies. The FRS has three wells, referred to here (from SW to NE) as the geophysics, injection and geochemistry wells. The 2018 VSP had thirteen source lines, four acquired with a 10 m Vibe Point (VP) spacing and the remainder acquired with a 60 m VP spacing. The source was an Inova Univib running a linear 1-150 Hz sweep with two sweeps per VP. In addition to existing permanent 3C geophones and optical fibre, a string of Inova 3C VectorSeis accelerometers was deployed in the geophysics well for this survey from surface to bottom hole. The accelerometer data are currently undergoing zero-offset and far-offset VSP processing. First-break picks sorted by offset and azimuth confirm the presence of very weak HTI anisotropy at the FRS, as observed on a single offset semi-circular walk-around VSP recorded in the injection well in 2015. Presentation Date: Wednesday, September 18, 2019 Session Start Time: 8:30 AM Presentation Start Time: 11:00 AM Location: 303B Presentation Type: Oral
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".