MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969241643 · doi:10.1111/rda.13551

miR‐17‐5p affects porcine granulosa cell growth and oestradiol synthesis by targeting <i>E2F1</i> gene

2019· article· en· W2969241643 on OpenAlexaff
Shuna Zhang, Ling Wang, Lei Wang, Yaru Chen, Fenge Li

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction in Domestic Animals · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNatural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
KeywordsGranulosa cellCell growthInternal medicineEndocrinologyGeneChemistryCell biologyBiologyCancer researchHormoneMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Female fertility potential is based on the development and growth of ovarian follicles. Our previous study showed that miR-17-5p was significantly differently expressed in pre-ovulatory ovarian follicles of Large White (LW) and Chinese Taihu (CT) sows. In the present study, we investigated the role of miR-17-5p in ovarian follicle development. We demonstrated that miR-17-5p overexpression significantly decreased the luciferase reporter activity containing the E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1) 3'untranslated region (3'UTR) and suppressed the E2F1 expression, whereas the miR-17-5p inhibition increased the E2F1 expression in porcine granulosa cells (pGCs). Meanwhile, miR-17-5p overexpression or E2F1 knockdown promoted cell growth, follicular development marker genes (LHR, CYP19A1 and AREG) expression and oestradiol synthesis, and miR-17-5p inhibition suppressed cell growth, follicular development marker genes (LHR, CYP19A1 and AREG) expression and oestradiol synthesis in pGCs. Furthermore, E2F1 knockdown increased CYP19A1 promoter activity. This study suggests that miR-17-5p regulates pGC growth and oestradiol synthesis by targeting E2F1 gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction in Domestic AnimalsSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207