Adsorption Process and Properties Analyses of a Pure Magadiite and a Modified Magadiite on Rhodamine-B from an Aqueous Solution
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The result of an adsorption experiment indicated that the pure magadiite (MAG) and the modified MAG via cetyltrimethylammonium-bromide (CTAB-MAG) possessed pronounced affinity to the Rhodamine-B (Rh-B) dye molecules. CTAB-MAG was synthesized with an ion-exchange method between MAG and cetyltrimethylammonium-bromide (CTAB) in an aqueous solution. The adsorption capacities of CTAB-MAG and MAG on Rh-B were 67.19 mg/g and 48.13 mg/g, respectively; while the pH and the time were 7 and 60 min, respectively; however, the initial concentration of Rh-B was 100 mg/L, and adsorbent dosage was 1 g/L. Whereas, the adsorption capacity of CTAB-MAG was increased by 40% over MAG which indicated that CTAB-MAG can be used as an efficient low-cost adsorbent. Adsorption kinetics were consistent with the pseudo-second-order kinetic equation; the adsorption processes were dominated by film diffusion process which belonged to monomolecular layer adsorption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".