MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969283472 · doi:10.1002/uog.20851

Effect of sildenafil on maternal hemodynamics in pregnancies complicated by severe early‐onset fetal growth restriction: planned subgroup analysis from a multicenter randomized placebo‐controlled double‐blind trial

2019· article· en· W2969283472 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Asma Khalil, Andrew Sharp, Christine Cornforth, Richard Jackson, H. Mousa, SJ Stock, J.A. Harrold, M. Turner, Louise C. Kenny, Philip N. Baker, Edward Johnstone, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A. Magee, Aris T. Papageorghiou, Žarko Alfirević

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEfficacy and Mechanism Evaluation ProgrammeMedical Research Council CanadaMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineSildenafilPlaceboHemodynamicsRandomizationCardiologyBlood pressureGestationInternal medicineVascular resistancePregnancyRandomized controlled trialAnesthesiaObstetrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Objectives Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with maternal cardiovascular changes. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase type‐5 inhibitor, potentiates the actions of nitric oxide, and it has been suggested that it alters maternal hemodynamics, potentially improving placental perfusion. Recently, the Dutch STRIDER trial was stopped prematurely owing to excess neonatal mortality secondary to pulmonary hypertension. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sildenafil on maternal hemodynamics in pregnancies with severe early‐onset FGR. Methods This was a cardiovascular substudy within a UK multicenter, placebo‐controlled trial, in which 135 women with a singleton pregnancy and severe early‐onset FGR (defined as a combination of estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference below the 10th centile and absent/reversed end‐diastolic flow in the umbilical artery on Doppler velocimetry, diagnosed between 22 + 0 and 29 + 6 weeks' gestation) were assigned randomly to receive either 25 mg sildenafil three times daily or placebo until 32 + 0 weeks' gestation or delivery. Maternal blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), augmentation index, pulse wave velocity (PWV), cardiac output, stroke volume (SV) and total peripheral resistance were recorded before randomization, 1–2 h and 48–72 h post‐randomization, and 24–48 h postnatally. For continuous data, analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA methods including terms for timepoint, treatment allocation and their interaction. Results Included were 134 women assigned randomly to sildenafil (n = 69) or placebo (n = 65) who had maternal BP and HR recorded at baseline. At 1–2 h post‐randomization, compared with baseline values, sildenafil increased maternal HR by 4 bpm more than did placebo (mean difference, 5.00 bpm (95% CI, 1.00–12.00 bpm) vs 1.25 bpm (95% CI, –5.38 to 7.88 bpm); P = 0.004) and reduced systolic BP by 1 mmHg more (mean difference, –4.13 mmHg (95% CI, –9.94 to 1.44 mmHg) vs –2.75 mmHg (95% CI, –7.50 to 5.25 mmHg); P = 0.048). Even after adjusting for maternal mean arterial pressure, sildenafil reduced aortic PWV by 0.60 m/s more than did placebo (mean difference, –0.90 m/s (95% CI, –1.31 to –0.51 m/s) vs –0.26 m/s (95% CI, –0.75 to 0.59 m/s); P = 0.001). Sildenafil was associated with a non‐significantly greater decrease in SV index after 1–2 h post‐randomization than was placebo (mean difference, –5.50 mL/m2 (95% CI, –11.00 to –0.50 mL/m2) vs 0.00 mL/m2 (95% CI, –5.00 to 4.00 mL/m2); P = 0.056). Conclusions Sildenafil in a dose of 25 mg three times daily increases HR, reduces BP and reduces arterial stiffness in pregnancies complicated by severe early‐onset FGR. These changes are short term, modest and consistent with the anticipated vasodilatory effect. They have no short‐ or long‐term clinical impact on the mother. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.009
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207