MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969318056 · doi:10.11575/prism/36709

Application of Epidemiology and Biostatistics to Malaria Diagnosis in Returning Travellers

2019· dissertation· en· W2969318056 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Cheaveau

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiostatisticsEpidemiologyMalariaMedicineImmunologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, malaria elimination is back on the agenda but for this to be feasible, there must be a coordinated global effort utilizing all available tools. Portable, sensitive diagnostics with a low limit of detection are required to detect the malaria reservoir, and novel antimalarials are required to combat the threat of artemisinin resistance. Returning travellers are a good population in which to investigate malaria physiology and diagnostics because there is a good supply of study participants and an abundance of easily available data. In Canada, a combination of microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests are used to diagnose malaria, but these lack sensitivity and require repeated testing to rule out the condition. A prospective diagnostic trial of the illumigene Malaria, loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay, manufactured by Meridian Bioscience was conducted in symptomatic returning travellers between June 2017 and January 2018. After discrepant resolution with RT-PCR, LAMP had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI; 95.8-100) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI; 98.7-100). In symptomatic returning travellers, LAMP has the potential to replace traditional malaria diagnostics, allowing for malaria to be ruled out in a timely manner. It is unclear if uncomplicated malaria causes deranged liver enzymes, which has implications for antimalarial drug development. A retrospective cohort study was evaluated in returning travellers (n=4548) who underwent a malaria test and had liver enzymes measured within 31 days from 2010-2017. After adjusting for gender, age, and use of hepatotoxic medications, returning travellers testing positive for malaria had higher odds of having an abnormal TB [(OR: 12.64, 95% CI: 6.32 – 25.29), p<0.001] but not ALP [(OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.09 – 1.10), p=0.072], ALT [(OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.54 – 1.89), p=0.978] or AST [(OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.22 – 7.37), p=0.794], compared to those who tested negative. This is most likely to be due to haemolysis, which normalizes following treatment. LAMP can be used in the diagnosis of malaria in returning travellers, and it may have a role in malaria elimination. Uncomplicated malaria does not appear to cause raised aminotransferases in returning travellers, and consideration must be given to this in antimalarial drug development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.098
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.098
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207