MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969343797 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2019-0194

Synthesis, characterization, and investigation of the antioxidant activity of some 1,2,4-benzothiadiazine-1,1-dioxides bearing sulfonylthioureas moieties

2019· article· en· W2969343797 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kamel Harrouche, Asma Lahouel, Mebrouk Belghobsi, Bernard Pirotte, Smaïl Khelili

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMoietyAntioxidantThioureaAscorbic acidDPPHABTSOrganic chemistryMedicinal chemistryStereochemistryCombinatorial chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A series of 1,2,4-benzothiadiazine-1,1-dioxides bearing a sulfonylthiourea moiety were synthesized, characterized, and screened for their antioxidant activity, using six antioxidant analytical assays comparatively to reference compounds, ascorbic acid and quercetin. The results indicated that several compounds demonstrated strong antioxidant activity in DPPH, ABTS, H 2 O 2 , and lipid peroxidation assays where some of them were either as active as or more active than reference compounds. However, all compounds were largely less active than references compounds in the reducing power assay. The results indicated that the thiourea moiety probably played a crucial role in the antioxidant activity of the target compounds, as a thiolate ion. The most favorable R 1 groups were the hydrogen atom and methyl group, followed by phenyl and benzyl groups, whereas the most favorable R 2 group was iPr, followed by the phenyl and methyl groups. The combination of benzothiadiazine ring with sulfonylthiourea moieties led to valuable new antioxidants, which could be used in the treatment or the prevention of certain diseases or in the field of cosmetics, which needs further investigations in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207