MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969373395 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.144403

Tuning magnetic order with geometry: Thermalization and defects in two-dimensional artificial spin ices

2020· article· en· W2969373395 on OpenAlexafffund
Gavin M. Macauley, Gary W. Paterson, Yue Li, Rair Macêdo, S. McVitie, R. L. Stamps

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilChina Scholarship CouncilCarnegie Trust for the Universities of ScotlandLeverhulme Trust
KeywordsSpin icePhysicsCondensed matter physicsScalingThermalisationGeometryMagnetic monopoleQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial spin ices are arrays of correlated nanoscale magnetic islands that prove an excellent playground in which to study the role of topology in critical phenomena. Here, we investigate a continuum of spin ice geometries, parametrized by rotation of the islands. In doing so, we morph from the classic square ice to the recently studied pinwheel geometry, with the rotation angle acting as a proxy for controlling interisland interactions. We experimentally observe a transition from antiferromagnetic ordering in square ice to a slight preference for ferromagnetic vertices in the weakly coupled pinwheel ice using Lorentz transmission electron microscopy on thermally annealed cobalt arrays. The rotation angle also affects the relaxation timescales for individual arrays, leading to varying degrees of thermalization, and an apparent change in the nature of the defects supported: from one-dimensional strings in square ice to two-dimensional vortexlike structures for geometries similar to pinwheel. The numerical scaling of these quantities is consistent with that predicted by the Kibble-Zurek mechanism. Our results show how magnetic order in artificial spin ices can be tuned by changes in geometry and suggest the possibility of realizing a truly frustrated ice-rule phase in two-dimensional systems. Furthermore, we demonstrate this system as a test bed to investigate out-of-equilibrium dynamics across phases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicAdvanced Condensed Matter PhysicsFrench-language works237,207