MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2969516895

3D 3C Seismic Imaging in the Athabasca Basin, Canada

2019· dissertation· en· W2969516895 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dong Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyAttenuationBoreholeGeophysical imagingAmplitudeAnelastic attenuation factorWaveformSeismic to simulationAzimuthVertical seismic profileSeismic waveGeophysicsSeismic inversionGeotechnical engineeringGeometryRadar
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the 3C-3D surface and downhole (VSP) seismic datasets previously collected at the Athabasca Basin McArthur River to Millennium uranium mine sites using a number of unconventional analytical methods. The objective is to understand the potential of the seismic method to delineate subsurface features such as the hydrothermal alteration footprint, the sandstone-basement unconformity and the subvertical thrust fault zone. Methodologies applied include a series of forward and data-driven approaches. First, this study accomplishes the prediction of the compressional and shear wave amplitude and traveltime using angle dependent reflectivity equations and 2D elastic finite-difference waveform models. The numerical predictions are based on the existing and estimated petrophysical data from the local area. Second, this study discovers a number of unique properties of the seismic wave attenuation from surface and downhole seismic datasets. Multiple methods applied to VSP datasets confirm that the attenuation quality factor (Q) in the study area is low and variable. Finally, this study analyzes the traveltime and waveform data collected from the unique 3C-3D-borehole seismic geometry at Millennium to delineate the subsurface geologic structures that are potentially related to the wave attenuation and velocity. A forward 3D visco-elastic waveform model is created to illustrate the observed abnormal amplitude and velocity azimuthal variations with a superimposed effect of intrinsic and scattering. The results from these series of approaches provide updated understandings of the alterations, structural geology, and their relationships with seismic data. These understandings contribute to the suggestions for future seismic imaging work such as converted shear wave processing, downhole seismic acquisition, and alteration footprint tomography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→