MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P3A.09: Physical activity, strength and fatigue in children with intestinal failure on parenteral nutrition

2019· article· en· W2969600257 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie So, Catherine Patterson, Zachary Betts, Christina Belza, Yaron Avitzur, Paul W. Wales

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParenteral nutritionGrip strengthPediatricsQuality of life (healthcare)Gestational ageIntestinal failurePhysical therapyInternal medicinePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: With improved survival of children with intestinal failure (IF), it is important to explore the subsequent impact on long-term physical function. This study evaluates functional outcomes of muscle strength, fatigue and physical activity (PA) and identifies clinical factors that may be predictive of impairment. Methods: Cross-sectional study in children with IF on long term parenteral nutrition (PN) compared to healthy age and gender matched controls (HC’s). Assessments included: Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (Strength and Agility subtest) (BOT-2), Grip strength, Paediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Physical Function subscale and Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Module, and Benefits/Barriers to PA Questionnaire. PA was measured using an accelerometer. Medical data was collected by chart abstraction. Results: Participants included 21 children with IF (14 male) at a median age of 8.33 (IQR 6.96, 11.04) years and 33 HC’s (20 males), 8.25 (6.67, 10.79) years. In those with IF, 13 (62%) were born prematurely (gestational age 35 (33, 38.5) weeks) and the most common diagnosis was gastroschisis (38%). Children received PN for 14 (11, 16) hours/day, with 17 (81%) dependent since infancy. Since birth, there was a median of 4 (1, 9) septic episodes and 15 (7.5, 24.5) in-patient hospitalizations. Mean BOT-2 standard scores [population norm of 50, SD of 10] were 61.27 +/- 6.8 for HC’s and 45.67 +/- 9.1 for children with IF, with 6/21 (28%) below average (>1SD below mean). 13/21 (62%) children fell >1SD below the mean norm for grip strength, compared to only 6/33 (18.2%) HC’s. Mean steps/day in children with IF was 9842 +/- 4077 compared to HC’s with 13104 +/- 5416. There was a significant difference between groups in strength and agility (p<.001), grip strength (p=.001), and total steps/day (p=.047). Medical variables significantly associated with BOT-2 scores are shown in Table 1. Results of the PedsQL are shown in Figure 1. Parents report greater fatigue (r=-.538, p=.012) and poorer physical function (r=-.650, p=.001) in children with more hospitalizations. Barriers to PA in children with IF included “I am tired” and “I am worried about my line.” Conclusion: Factors such as prematurity, decreased linear growth, hospitalization and septic events may have a significant impact on physical function outcomes in children with IF on PN. Ongoing development of medical and rehabilitation intervention strategies is vital to optimize outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyFrench-language works237,207