MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969604357 · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12479

Associations of fat‐soluble micronutrients and redox biomarkers with frailty status in the FRAILOMIC initiative

2019· article· en· W2969604357 on OpenAlex
Bastian Kochlik, Wolfgang Stuetz, Karine Pérès, Sophie Pilleron, Catherine Féart, Francisco J. García‐García, Stefania Bandinelli, David Gómez-Cabrero, Leocadio Rodríguez‐Mañas, Tilman Grune, Daniela Weber

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleEuropean Commission
KeywordsZeaxanthinLuteinMicronutrientLycopeneMedicineCarotenoidConfidence intervalOdds ratioCohortOxidative stressVitaminInternal medicinePhysiologyFood scienceBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background A poor fat‐soluble micronutrient (FMN) and a high oxidative stress status are associated with frailty. Our aim was to determine the cross‐sectional association of FMNs and oxidative stress biomarkers [protein carbonyls (PrCarb) and 3‐nitrotyrosine] with the frailty status in participants older than 65 years. Methods Plasma levels of vitamins A (retinol), D 3 , E (α‐tocopherol and γ‐tocopherol) and carotenoids (α‐carotene and β‐carotene, lycopene, lutein/zeaxanthin, and β‐cryptoxanthin), PrCarb, and 3‐nitrotyrosine were measured in 1450 individuals of the FRAILOMIC initiative. Participants were classified into robust, pre‐frail, and frail using Fried's frailty criteria. Associations between biomarkers and frailty status were assessed by general linear and logistic regression models, both adjusted for cohort, season of blood sampling, gender, age, height, weight, and smoking. Results Robust participants had significantly higher vitamin D 3 and lutein/zeaxanthin concentrations than pre‐frail and frail subjects; had significantly higher γ‐tocopherol, α‐carotene, β‐carotene, lycopene, and β‐cryptoxanthin concentrations than frail subjects, and had significantly lower PrCarb concentrations than frail participants in multivariate linear models. Frail subjects were more likely to be in the lowest than in the highest tertile for vitamin D 3 (adjusted odds ratio: 2.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.42–3.26), α‐tocopherol (2.12; 1.39–3.24), α‐carotene (1.69; 1.00–2.88), β‐carotene (1.84; 1.13–2.99), lycopene (1.94; 1.24–3.05), lutein/zeaxanthin (3.60; 2.34–5.53), and β‐cryptoxanthin (3.02; 1.95–4.69) and were more likely to be in the highest than in the lowest tertile for PrCarb (2.86; 1.82–4.49) than robust subjects in multivariate regression models. Conclusions Our study indicates that both low FMN and high PrCarb concentrations are associated with pre‐frailty and frailty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.251

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it