MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969615947

Leslie Martin y el orden formal = Leslie Martin and the formal order

2016· article· es· W2969615947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Proyectos Arquitectónicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicArchitecture, Modernity, and Design
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtCartographyGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen Este articulo analiza la arquitectura de Sir Leslie Martin (1908-2000) y  recorre el intenso itinerario profesional que se inicia con la construccion de la escuela infantil en Northwich, Cheshire (1937-1938)  o la casa Alastair Morton en Brampton (1938) adscritas a la ortodoxia de la arquitectura moderna, y continua con los proyectos que realiza, como arquitecto  responsable de la compania de ferrocarriles, en estaciones y  reordenaciones de infraestructuras del ferrocarril en la posguerra,  intervenciones que le prepararan para su etapa de madurez arquitectonica que cristaliza en los edificios para el Royal Festival Hall en Londres  (1948-1951), el Harvey Court en Cambridge (1958-1962), los auditorios  del Middleton Hall de la Universidad de Hull (1958), la Escuela de Musica  (1974) y el College (1979) en la Universidad de Cambridge o el concurso de la Universidad de Bristol (1979) que ilustran los fundamentos esenciales de su coherente trayectoria arquitectonica donde confluyen la  tradicion de la arquitectura moderna, la continuidad espacial y el orden  formal. Este recorrido por las obras realizadas en la decada de los cincuenta, sesenta y setenta permite ilustrar las constantes del arquitecto  a traves del recorrido cronologico por sus obras revelando los mecanismos compositivos, la busqueda del orden formal y la correcta organizacion  espacial atendiendo a los requerimientos funcionales, las relaciones con el sitio y los medios tecnologicos que determinan el conjunto de su  trayectoria caracterizada por la consistencia formal y la coherencia  arquitectonica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it