INVESTIGATING NON-INCANDESCENCE EMISSION DURING LASER INDUCED INCANDESCENCE EXPERIMENTS ON AEROSOLIZED PLASMONIC NANOPARTICLES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-resolved laser-induced incandescence (TiRe-LII) experiments conducted on aerosolized Ag, commercial soot and Au nanoparticles energized with a 1064 nm laser pulse. Detected TiRe-LII signal from aerosolized Ag nanoparticles suggest that the observed signal could originate from electron neutral bremsstrahlung and not of incandescence origin. A new model is proposed based on plasmonically-enhanced photoemission of electrons from Ag nanoparticles. The interaction of the electrons with buffer gas neutral species leads to inverse neutral bremsstrahlung absorption of the laser pulse as well as neutral bremsstrahlung emission. The new model could potentially explain some of the anomalies observed during TiRe-LII experiments as a secondary signal contaminating the original incandescence signal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".