MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969641245 · doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ab3618

A pulsed high-current plasma beam under external and self-induced magnetic confinement in a linear device

2019· article· en· W2969641245 on OpenAlex
Xiang Zheng, Fujun Gou, Y. Zhou, Hengjing Wang, Alex Wallace, Haokai Wang, Zhijing Huang, X.Q. Ji, Shaoyong Liang, W Liu, Y. Feng, B.Q. Deng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsHOPE Innovations (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPlasmaCurrent (fluid)Materials sciencePlasma confinementBeam (structure)Atomic physicsMagnetic confinement fusionCondensed matter physicsPhysicsNuclear physicsOpticsTokamak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The previously developed governing equations for Magnetic Inertial Confinement Fusion, which combines the advantages of both magnetic and inertial confinement approaches, are improved to analyse a plasma beam in a linear device assisted by an external magnetic field. The equations are applied to simulate a steady state plasma beam sustained by a DC power supply as well as a transient beam generated by a separate pulsed discharge superimposed on the steady-state plasma. The calculated increase of plasma density during the pulse from the steady-state condition is compared with measurements using a laser interferometer at a relatively low voltage supply of 150 V for the pulses. The numerical and test results are found to agree within 20%. When the voltage rises, plasma instability is observed. This issue is inherent due to the use of a solid positive target electrode that blocks the plasma flow in the axial direction. As a remedy, additional tests were carried out using a hollow target electrode in a two-circuit design (to permit free gas flow in the axial direction) by replacing the DC power with transient, pulsed, high-voltage sources for plasma initiation and beam formation. These enhancements were successful in suppressing the instabilities. The peak plasma density was calculated at ∼10 22 m −3 for confinement times of the order of 1 ms. These results lie between the extremes for the current leading approaches yet are achieved for a more compact and inexpensive linear device.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it