Clinical significance of posttraumatic intracranial hemorrhage in clinically mild brain injury: a retrospective cohort study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Much attention has been focused on management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI); however, comparatively little is known about management of traumatic hemorrhage in clinically mild TBI. We aimed to clarify the role of clinical observation and repeat radiography for patients with mild TBI and abnormal findings on initial computed tomography (CT) of the head. METHODS: We queried the neurotrauma database of the Ontario Trauma Registry and the Sunnybrook institutional database to identify patients with CT findings of a traumatic hemorrhage or calvarial fracture between November 2014 and December 2016. Exclusionary criteria were age less than 16 years, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score less than 13, anticoagulant use, bleeding diathesis and midline shift greater than 5 mm. The primary outcome was the need for neurosurgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 607 patients were included. Most (374 [61.6%]) had a GCS score of 15; 185 (30.5%) and 48 (7.9%) had a GCS score of 14 and 13, respectively. Five patients (0.8%) required surgical intervention, all within the first 72 hours, owing to clinical deterioration with subsequently demonstrated radiographic evidence of expanding hemorrhage. Most patients (506 [83.4%]) had routine repeat imaging, without documented change in their neurologic status. INTERPRETATION: The majority of patients in our cohort had repeat imaging, which did not influence surgical management, at substantial cost to the health care system. The findings suggest the need to reevaluate repeat imaging protocols for this subset of patients with TBI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".