Mémoire et identité dans les œuvres de Moacyr Scliar (Brésil) et de Régine Robin (Québec, Canada)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Il s’agit d’une etude des œuvres de Moacyr Scliar et de Regine Robin. Les ecrits de Moacyr Scliar sont axes surtout autour de la problematique de l’immigration juive au Bresil et de l’adaptation et integration au milieu de la societe bresilienne. Il construit avec humour et legerete des personnages souvent en conflit interne pour essayer de constituer eux-memes une identite composee de traces de memoires et de la nouvelle realite qui les entourent. C’est le cas des personnages de ses oeuvres qu’integrent mon corpus, a savoir, Le Centaure dans le jardin et Sa majeste des indiens. Les ecrits de la franco-quebecoise Regine Robin comprennent plusieurs domaines de connaissance et suivent une tendance ou un courant d’ecrivains quebecois qui privilegient dans leurs ecrits une idee de construction nationale qui n’a pas le pays comme le centre, mais un abordage identitaire qui renforce et signale l’ample diversite culturelle et ethnique qui compose le Quebec. C’est ce qu’ils appellent l’ecriture migrante. Notre interet est surtout axe sur sa production litteraire, a savoir le roman La Quebecoite et son livre de contes L’immense fatigue des Pierres. Cependant, sa production en tant que theoricienne fourni des elements complementaires pour l’analyse de ses œuvres litteraires, comme par exemple Le roman memoriel, Kafka, et La memoire saturee. Regine Robin et Moacyr Scliar ont en commun le fait de creer dans leurs livres un espace intermediaire entre les faits et la fiction, et aussi de presenter des expressions de la communaute americaine d’origine juive. De sorte que s’entremelent, chez eux, une dimension nationale, une dimension regionale, et une dimension communautaire transnationale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Direct model labels (unvalidated)
Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.
| Model arm | Categories | Study design | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| gemma | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Not applicable | low |
| gpt | no category Domain: not available · Genre: Other About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: yes | Theoretical or conceptual | low |
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedLabeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.
The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".