MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2969763817 · doi:10.1139/gen-2019-0075

Signatures of directional selection in a hybrid yeast population

2019· article· en· W2969763817 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoguang Sun, Li Ni, Guan Wang, Xiaohui Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Eye InstituteNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyMeiosisGeneticsRecombinationGene conversionHomologous recombinationLinkage disequilibriumSelection (genetic algorithm)PopulationGenomeEctopic recombinationEvolutionary biologyGenetic recombinationNucleotide diversityBackground selectionGeneAlleleHaplotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meiotic recombination is a fundamental biological process that leads to crossover and gene conversion. High resolution maps of meiotic recombination have been reported in several model organisms. However, few studies have studied how rapidly selection affects the products of meiotic recombination. Here we constructed and sequenced a yeast population of 38 haploid strains derived from hybridizations of two common used strains S288c and YJM789. We identified 20 regions with strong biased allele frequency across the genome, revealing signatures of selection in a rather short period. These regions harbor ample crossovers and gene conversions, which enable us to trace how selection works on the genomic fragments after meiosis. The total length of such regions under selection accounts for 5% of the entire genome, and those regions contain many functional-related genes. In addition, recombination breaks down linkage disequilibrium to half of its maximum within 42 kb and reduces nucleotide diversity significantly in selected regions. Our study thus provides details of directional selection on the outcomes of meiotic recombination using experimental approaches, and will shed light on our understanding of the fast reshaping of population structure by selection, as well as the important roles of recombination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome→Same topicFungal and yeast genetics research→French-language works237,207→