MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969891150 · doi:10.31487/j.jfnm.2019.02.02

Diets containing naturally occurring iron or naturally occurring iron plus supplemental ferrous sulfate both maintain normal hematological status in adult dogs

2019· article· en· W2969891150 on OpenAlexaff
Anna K. Shoveller, Debbie Minikhiem, Gail Kuhlman, Cara Cargo-Froom, Kathy Boebel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Nutrition and Metabolism · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersOhio State University
KeywordsFerrousHemoglobinAnemiaAnimal sciencePalatabilityIron supplementIron deficiencyChemistryMean corpuscular volumeTotal iron-binding capacityIron-deficiency anemiaMedicineFood scienceInternal medicineBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Iron is an essential mineral for dogs due to its roles in physiological processes. The NRC recommends the adequate intake for iron in adult dogs is 0.5 mg/kg of body weight. While iron should be present in high enough concentrations in the diet to maintain normal hematological status and prevent iron deficiency anemia, too much dietary iron can increase lipid oxidation in the food during preparation and storage, subsequently reducing shelf life, palatability, and nutritional content of foods. In general, iron is supplemented to diets to ensure that no dogs are deficient. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the ability of a diet containing either 0 mg/kg or 80 mg/kg supplemental iron to support normal hematological parameters in adult dogs. Twenty-two adult dogs were randomly assigned to one of two treatment diets: Test Diet 1, Experimental maintenance formula with 115 mg/kg endogenous iron + 0 mg/kg supplemental iron; and Test Diet 2, Experimental maintenance formula with 115 mg/kg endogenous iron + 80 mg/kg supplemental iron (ferrous sulfate). Dogs consumed treatment diets for 26 weeks, with clinical assessments (e.g., hemoglobin concentration/total iron binding capacity) assessed throughout the trial (0, 2, 4, and 6 months). Baseline iron related endpoints were not different between diet treatments (P > 0.50), except for mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentrations (P = 0.046). No differences were found for iron related end points between the two diet treatments (P>0.05) at any time point. In some diets no supplemental iron will be needed, based on the diet matrix, whereas others may require some supplemental iron. By reducing iron inclusion in the formulations of canine diets, food stability and shelf life may be improved. This reduction in supplemental iron can also reduce cost of formulation, benefiting food manufacturers, consumers, and adult dogs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Food Nutrition and MetabolismSame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207