A CRITERION FOR EVALUATION OF THE VALIDITY OF BLACK CARBON REFRACTIVE INDEX FROM MEASUREMENTS OF LIGHT ABSORPTION IN THE VISIBLE AND NEAR-INFRARED
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fractal-like black carbon particles emitted from combustion systems and biomass burning are short-lived pollutants that contribute significantly to climate forcing. To accurately quantify the forcing and interpret optical measurements of uncoated and coated black carbon (BC) particles, it is indispensable to know the refractive index m = n + ki of BC in the visible and near infrared. In this study the effects of various morphological parameters and structure defects of black carbon particles on their mass absorption cross section (MAC) were first investigated using the generalized Mie-solution method (GMM) and discrete dipole approximation (DDA). The accuracy of the Rayleigh-Debye-Gans (RDG) approximation is also evaluated. Based on recent measurements of the soot absorption function E(m) and freshly emitted BC MAC in the visible and near-infrared, the most probable range of E(m) was recommended. A criterion was proposed to determine the valid range of refractive index of freshly emitted BC based on the contour plot of E(m) on the n-k plane.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it