MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969962829

The Transatlantic Studies Association 18th Annual Conference. Paper 'David Douglas’ Canadian Trees: The Romantic Imagination versus the Lumber Industry.'

2019· article· en· W2969962829 on OpenAlex
Susan Oliver

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access at Essex (University of Essex) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRomanceEstateArt historyMemoirHistoryTRIPS architectureArtLawEngineeringPolitical scienceLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Born the son of a stone mason in 1799 and initially working as a gardener at Scone Palace and at Sir Robert Preston’s Valleyfield estate in Fife, David Douglas became one of Scotland’s foremost botanists and a prominent 19th early century explorer after gaining access to Preston’s extensive natural science library. Valleyfield, which was visited by Robert Burns and Walter Scott, had been landscaped by Humpry Repton in 1800 and contained imported specimen trees. As an estate with aesthetic and literary recognition, Douglas could hardly have wished for a better step towards his eventual main career. His interests led him quickly to take another job at Glasgow Botanical Gardens, where he became friends with William Hooker, Professor of Botany at Glasgow University. Following collecting trips with Hooker in his own nation and then in Pennsylvania, Douglas then went westwards to the Pacific north-western coast to 'discover', name and export to Britain hundreds of plant species and the two tree species that would most transform the nation’s forested landscapes: Douglas fir and Sitka spruce. Both trees were commercially valued for their size, straight trunks and fast growth. The sublime proportions and presence of the native trees captivated Douglas at the same time that he ensured their destruction at the hands of the lumber industry. My paper explores the conflict between a Romantic imagination and the drive for scientific enterprise in Douglas’s letters (including Hooker’s memoirs and extracts from his letter) and his journals from before and during the journey he made with the Hudson’s Bay Company to Port Vancouver (Sketch of a Journey to the North-Western Parts of the Continent of North-America during the Years 1824-27). I will also trace and explain the significance of some of main the literary sources from Britain, Europe and North America that influenced Douglas, including William Curtis’s exquisitely illustrated The Botanical Magazine, for which Hooker was a contributor and eventual editor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it