The Transatlantic Studies Association 18th Annual Conference. Paper 'David Douglas’ Canadian Trees: The Romantic Imagination versus the Lumber Industry.'
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Born the son of a stone mason in 1799 and initially working as a gardener at Scone Palace and at Sir Robert Preston’s Valleyfield estate in Fife, David Douglas became one of Scotland’s foremost botanists and a prominent 19th early century explorer after gaining access to Preston’s extensive natural science library. Valleyfield, which was visited by Robert Burns and Walter Scott, had been landscaped by Humpry Repton in 1800 and contained imported specimen trees. As an estate with aesthetic and literary recognition, Douglas could hardly have wished for a better step towards his eventual main career. His interests led him quickly to take another job at Glasgow Botanical Gardens, where he became friends with William Hooker, Professor of Botany at Glasgow University. Following collecting trips with Hooker in his own nation and then in Pennsylvania, Douglas then went westwards to the Pacific north-western coast to 'discover', name and export to Britain hundreds of plant species and the two tree species that would most transform the nation’s forested landscapes: Douglas fir and Sitka spruce. Both trees were commercially valued for their size, straight trunks and fast growth. The sublime proportions and presence of the native trees captivated Douglas at the same time that he ensured their destruction at the hands of the lumber industry. My paper explores the conflict between a Romantic imagination and the drive for scientific enterprise in Douglas’s letters (including Hooker’s memoirs and extracts from his letter) and his journals from before and during the journey he made with the Hudson’s Bay Company to Port Vancouver (Sketch of a Journey to the North-Western Parts of the Continent of North-America during the Years 1824-27). I will also trace and explain the significance of some of main the literary sources from Britain, Europe and North America that influenced Douglas, including William Curtis’s exquisitely illustrated The Botanical Magazine, for which Hooker was a contributor and eventual editor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.183 | 0.048 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".