An Examination of Student Club Activities from the Perspective of School Principals and Teachers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the effects of student club activities in high schools in Kars province, Turkey on the development ofstudents’ social skills, democracy and governance skills, recreation education and community service skills wereexamined. The qualitative research technique was used in the study and data were collected with the semi-structuredinterview technique. The data were obtained from 8 school principals and 12 club advisors from different schooltypes determined with the maximum variation sampling method. According to the results, the educators in thesample concluded that the student clubs achieved their objectives in the theme of democracy and governance skillsbut were not effective in the other themes. The reasons for this ineffectiveness emerged as deficiencies in thephysical environment in the schools, lack of time allotted for activities, excessive numbers of students in the clubsand unwillingness of teachers with regard to club activities. It was suggested that if the choice of whether or not toengage in club activities is left to students, the activities in clubs will become more attractive and thus theireffectiveness will increase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".