The (3+3) commensurately modulated structure of the uranyl silicate mineral swamboite-(Nd), Nd<sub>0.333</sub>[(UO<sub>2</sub>)(SiO<sub>3</sub>OH)](H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2.41</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The uranyl mineral swamboite has been redefined to swamboite-(Nd) and its structure has been solved and refined as a commensurate structure in six-dimensional superspace. The structure is monoclinic, superspace group P21 /m(a1,b1,g1)00(−a1,b1,g1)00 (a2,0,g2)0s, cell parameters a=6.6560(3), b=6.9881(5), c=8.8059(6), c=11.3361(16) Å, β=102.591(5)°, modulation wave-vectors q 1 =1/3 1/3 0; q 2 =−1/3 1/3 0; q 3 =1/2 0 1/2. The structure was refined from 8717 reflections to a final R=0.0610. The model includes modulation both of atomic positions and displacement parameters, as well as occupancy waves. The structure is based upon uranyl-silicate sheets of uranophane topology alternating with an interlayer of partly occupied Nd3+ sites and H2O molecules. The strong (3+3) dimensional modulation of the structure originates from the distribution of the Nd-dominated sites and further accommodation of the suitable geometry within the sheets and charge distribution within the structure. The separation distances between the corresponding occupied Nd sites are rationals of the super-cell vectors corresponding to the modulation vectors of the structure. The case of swamboite-(Nd) is the first example of a modulated structure within the oxysalts of U6+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".