Coexistence of Myelolipoma and Primary Bilateral Macronodular Adrenal Hyperplasia With GIP-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Adrenal myelolipomas are usually isolated benign adrenal lesions, but can be found adjacent to steroid-secreting adrenocortical tumors. We studied the aberrant regulation of cortisol secretion in a 61 year-old woman with combined bilateral myelolipomas and primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia (BMAH) causing Cushing’s syndrome. The goal was to identify potential aberrant ligands and hormone receptors regulating cortisol excess, using both an in vivo investigation protocol and in vitro studies on resected adrenals. Materials and methods: Cortisol response was measured during in vivo tests that transiently modulated the levels of ligands for potential aberrant receptors, including GIP. Response to medical therapies decreasing GIP was monitored. Expression of ACTH and of GIP receptors were examined in resected adrenal tissues by immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: In vivo, cortisol increased in response to mixed meals (+353%), oral 75 g glucose (+71%), GIP infusion (+416%) and hLH IV (+243%). Suppression of GIP by pasireotide improved cortisol secretion but produced hyperglycemia. The left adrenal was predominantly composed of myelolipoma and strands of BMAH, while the right was mainly composed of BMAH with some foci of myelolipoma on pathology. No ACTH was detectable by immunohistochemistry in BMAH or myelolipomas tissue. Ectopic GIP receptor was confirmed by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in BMAH tissues but not in the myelolipomas. Conclusion: This is the first report of interspersed myelolipoma and BMAH with GIP-dependent Cushing’s syndrome. Their simultaneous occurrence may suggest yet to be identified adrenocortical tissue paracrine factors regulated by aberrant receptors which could stimulate adipocyte and hematopoietic cell proliferation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".