Divergence of duplicated genes by repeated partitioning of splice forms and subcellular localization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gene duplication is a prominent and recurrent process in plant genomes. Among the possible fates of duplicated genes, subfunctionalization refers to duplicates taking on different parts of the function or expression pattern of the ancestral gene. This partitioning could be accompanied by changes in subcellular localization of the protein products. When alternative splicing of gene products leads to protein products with different subcellular localizations, we propose that after gene duplication there will be partitioning of the alternatively spliced forms such that the products of each duplicate are localized to only one of the original locations, which we refer to as sublocalization. We identified the plastid ascorbate peroxidase (cpAPX) genes across angiosperms and analyzed their duplication history, alternative splicing, and subcellular targeting patterns to identify cases of sublocalization. We found angiosperms typically have one cpAPX gene that generates both thylakoidal APX (tAPX) and stromal APX (sAPX) through alternative splicing. We identified several independent lineage-specific sublocalization cases with specialized paralogues of tAPX and sAPX. We determined that the sublocalization happened through two types of sequence evolution patterns. Our findings suggest that the divergence through sublocalization is key to the retention of paralogous cpAPX genes in angiosperms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".