Canadian Scientists and Military Research in the Cold War, 1947–60
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the militarization of academic science in Canada during the Cold War period between 1947 and 1960. As evidenced by the extramural program of the Defence Research Board (drb), the scientific research branch of the Canadian armed services, funding for defence attracted faculty and graduate students to the world of military research. Government officials and civilian scientists collaborated to establish and grow the drb’s extramural program, championing military research at Canadian universities and shaping academic work in both the physical and social sciences. Academics across the country benefited from the autonomy drb scientists held over the direction and distribution of federal funds made available for military research, suggesting that the militarization of academic science in Canada came from within the existing scientific community. An assessment of the political and financial ties established among government authorities and university scientists reveals the extent to which national security concerns influenced the work of some of Canada’s top academics. Military sponsorship is an understudied yet important object of theory and analysis for historians of Canada and the Cold War, and it is incumbent upon Canadian historians to discuss and debate the role and influence of military research in the university context.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".