MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970449827

SDTDMn0 : a multidimensional distributed data mining framework supporting time series data analysis for critical care research

2011· dissertation· en· W2970449827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Agam Dhanoa

Bibliographic record

Venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology) · 2011
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData scienceComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Time seriesData miningMachine learningGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Premature birth is one of the major perinatal health issues across the world. In 2007, the\nestimated Canadian preterm birth rate was 8.1 % (CIHI, 2009). Recent research has shown that\nconditions, such as nosocomial infections or apnoeas, exhibit certain variations in the baby's\nphysiological parameters which can indicate the onset of the event before it can be detected by\nphysicians and nurses. Neonatal Intensive Care Units are some of the highest information\nproducing areas in hospitals. The multidimensional and distributed nature of the data further adds\nanother layer of complexity as physiological changes can occur in one data stream or can be\ncross-correlated between several streams. With the collection and storage of electronic data\nbecoming a global trend, there is an opportunity to analyse the collected data in order to extract\nmeaningful information and improve healthcare. The aforementioned properties of the data\nmotivate the need for a framework that supports analysis and trend detection in a\nmultidimensional and distributed environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-scholar@UOIT (University of Ontario Institute of Technology)Same topicTime Series Analysis and ForecastingFrench-language works237,207