Association of lipid-related genes implicated in conceptus elongation with female fertility traits in dairy cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elongation of the preimplantation conceptus is a requirement for pregnancy success in ruminants, and failures in this process are highly associated with subfertility in dairy cattle. Identifying genetic markers that are related to early conceptus development and survival and utilizing these markers in selective breeding can improve the reproductive efficiency of dairy herds. Here, we evaluated the association of 1,679 SNP markers within or close to 183 candidate genes involved in lipid metabolism of the elongating conceptus with different fertility traits in US Holstein cattle. A total of 27,371 bulls with predicted transmitting ability records for daughter pregnancy rate, cow conception rate, and heifer conception rate were used as the discovery population. The associations found in the discovery population were validated using 2 female populations (1,122 heifers and 2,138 lactating cows) each with 4 fertility traits, including success to first insemination, number of services per conception, age at first conception for heifers, or days open for cows. Marker effects were estimated using a linear mixed model with SNP genotype as a linear covariate and a random polygenic effect. After multiple testing correction, 39 SNP flagging 27 candidate genes were associated with at least one fertility trait in the discovery population. Of these 39 markers, 3 SNP were validated in the heifer population and 4 SNP were validated in the cow population. The 3 SNP validated in heifers are located within or near genes CAT, MYOF, and RBP4, and the 4 SNP validated in lactating cows are located within or close to genes CHKA, GNAI1, and HMOX2. These validated genes seem to be relevant for reducing pregnancy losses, and the SNP within these genes are excellent candidates for inclusion in genomic tests to improve reproductive performance in dairy cattle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".