MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970610550 · doi:10.14288/1.0380593

Selenium removal from waste waters by chemical reduction with chromous ions

2019· article· en· W2970610550 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Mohammadi

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSelenium in Biological Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceSeleniumReduction (mathematics)Waste managementEnvironmental chemistryChemistryEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Selenium can be released to the environment from both natural and industrial activities, resulting in increased selenium concentrations in surface and ground water. Even small concentrations of selenium can be toxic for many forms of aquatic life. Therefore, selenium contamination in the receiving environment is a key issue for many industries. Selenium speciation in solution plays an important role in its removal. Selenite (SeO₃²⁻, Se(IV)) and selenate (SeO₄²⁻, Se(VI)) are the most important inorganic selenium species which are generally found in water and known to be toxic. Relative to the selenate, selenite can be quite easily removed from solutions using various treatment methods such as chemical reduction, precipitation and adsorption by ferrihydrite salts. However, these methods are not efficient for selenate removal. Typically, chemically based treatment processes for selenate removal require an initial reduction of selenate to the lower oxidation states (e.g., selenite, H₂Se). Chromous ions have been known as a powerful reducing agent in the reduction of many organic compounds, oxides, and sulphide minerals and in many proposed novel hydrometallurgical processes. Therefore, there is a high potential for chromous ions to reduce selenate effectively. In this study, the fundamental and practical aspects of the selenate reduction by chromous ions as a novel method to remove selenate from waste waters was investigated mainly in sulfate media. At first, the stoichiometry of selenate reduction by chromous ions was studied. Secondly, the kinetics of selenate reduction by chromous ions was studied over the wide range of acidity, chromous concentration, temperature and ionic strength. The reaction order with respect to the concentrations of selenate, chromous ions and hydrogen ions and the general rate law equation were determined. Furthermore, the effect of sulfate ions on the selenate reduction rate at different ionic strengths was studied. Thirdly, the reaction mechanism responsible for the reduction of selenate by chromous ions was suggested. Finally, the removal of hydrogen selenide generated from the reduction of selenate with chromous ions was studied using three reagents. Additionally, a hydrometallurgy flowsheet incorporating chromous generation, selenate reduction, hydrogen selenide removal, and chromic precipitation units was proposed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.159
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicSelenium in Biological SystemsFrench-language works237,207