MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970687393

JOINT INFLUENCE OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND QUALITY OF SLEEP ON PREGNANCY-RELATED ANXIETY

2019· article· en· W2970687393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
EK Wilsie, CK Connolly, ZW Osborn, Maria A. Gartstein, Sandra J. Waters

Bibliographic record

VenueTopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyPregnancySleep qualitySleep (system call)Joint (building)PsychologyQuality (philosophy)MedicineClinical psychologyPsychiatryComputer scienceInsomniaEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

E.K. Wilsie1, C.P. Connolly1, Z.W. Osborn1, M. Gartstein1, S. Waters1 1Washington State University, Pullman, WA; 1Washington State University, Vancouver, WA Pregnancy-related anxiety (PRA) is experienced by many women, given the physical and psychosocial challenges common during pregnancy and the prospect of childbirth. Some health behaviors, such as physical activity and quality of sleep (QS), are related to decreased PRA, but their joint influence is unclear. PURPOSE: We examined the individual and joint influences of physical activity behaviors and QS on PRA among pregnant women at two locations. METHODS: Third-trimester pregnant women (N=33) participated in a series of measurements between 28-36 weeks gestational age. Participants answered questions recalling their moderate and vigorous physical activity (min/wk) for prepregnancy, in the first and second trimesters, and concurrently. Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was calculated for prepregnancy and for each trimester. Participants also wore a validated physical activity monitor (Modus StepWatch) for one week, and average steps/day were calculated. QS was evaluated with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), calculating a global score. The Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire (PRAQ-R) was used to assess women’s anxiety regarding childbirth and the health of the baby. Median split was used to categorize PRA as “high” [≥15.0 PRA scale] or “low” [RESULTS: Mann-Whitney U-tests showed lower PRA participants had significantly superior third trimester global QS scores [p=0.048]. Likewise, global QS scores were related to increased odds of high PRA [β=1.34, 95% CI: 0.99-1.80]. Average steps/day and self-reported MVPA prior to pregnancy and at all pregnancy timepoints were not related to PRA. Hierarchical analyses did not reveal an interactive effect of steps/day and QS or MVPA and QS on PRA as hypothesized. CONCLUSION: Lower QS is related to higher PRA during the third trimester of pregnancy. Physical activity was not related to PRA and interactive effects with QS on PRA were not found. Larger samples are needed to confirm these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University)Same topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207