B-36 Effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy on Cognitive Performance and Depressive Symptoms: A Naturalistic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective 1) Examine the short- and long-term effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)—conducted in a naturalistic treatment setting—on objective and subjective cognitive functioning. 2) Examine the long-term effects of naturalistic ECT on depressive symptoms. Method Participants (N = 108) were outpatients (aged 18-65) diagnosed with a Major Depressive Episode who received ECT at St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Ontario. Parameters of ECT varied clinically. Participants completed a cognitive and psychological test battery at baseline (n = 108), mid-treatment (n = 82), 2–6-weeks post-ECT (n = 52), 6-months post-ECT (n = 24), and 12-months post-ECT (n = 14) that included Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Squire Subjective Memory Questionnaire (SSMQ), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-2). Results Overall cognitive performance (total RBANS scaled scores) did not improve from baseline to 2-6 weeks post-ECT (p = 0.156), significantly improved from baseline to 6-months post-ECT (t(22) = -2.34, p = .026, CI: = -8.93– -0.63), but were not maintained at 12-months post-ECT (p = 0.20). SSMQ scores significantly worsened from baseline to mid-ECT (t(75) = -5.04, p < .001, CI: -17.53– -7.60), but returned to baseline levels by 2–6-weeks post-ECT. Depressive symptoms (BDI-II) significantly improved by the 4th ECT session and gains were maintained across all timepoints (p < 0.004). WHODAS-2 scores significantly improved from baseline and were maintained across follow-up (t < 0.05). Conclusion ECT was effective at improving depressive symptoms in a naturalistic setting with diverse patient presentations. Preliminary findings show minimal, if any, gains in cognitive performance–although, functioning did not appear to worsen following ECT. RBANS may not be sufficiently sensitive. Developing recommendations for conducting and evaluating ECT in naturalistic settings marks an essential next step.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".